Blog Archive

Saturday, April 6, 2013

千人计划为什么没有吸引更多的海外学者?



    千人计划实行以来,吸引了一些海外华人学者归国效力,但一般认为不是特别成功。海外华人教授聚会时,是不是回国是一个永久话题。这几年虽然千人计划提供了一个好平台,但似乎更多学者倾向于不回了。为什么呢?当然原因很多,而且对不同人有不同原因。我这里说一点原因,估计主要适用于美欧名校正教授(也就是学术型千人的定位)。

    这一点可以用 Steve Jobs (史蒂夫 乔布斯)之问来概括:“Do you want to sell sugar water for the rest of your life or do you want to change the world?” (是卖糖水还是改变世界?) 也许改变世界的口气太大了,另一种说法是make a difference。 如果回国后只是做一些在美国也能做的事,也就是说只不过是卖糖水,吸引力就不大了。如果归国后能像当初春秋战国时人才流动一样,推动体制建设和国家发展,谱写历史,肯定有很多人愿意做。即使只是在小范围内做一些有意义的事,也会有不少人愿意。对于一些人来说,由于还有归属感的考虑,因此即使只是卖糖水(而不是卖假糖水 )也愿意。

    千人计划想吸引的美欧名校正教授不仅生活还不错,工作也潇洒自在。以我本人为例。虽然辞去长江学者后就没有在国内工作的义务了,但这几年每年在国内大概还是有两个月以上,做一些自己愿意做的事 。虽然没有做成什么事,至少说明了在美国当教授的自由自在。当然工作还是有压力的,但到了正教授了这压力就主要是自找的,是因为希望作出流传后世的成果。对于已经有终生职位的教授,如果真想换一种生活方式,不做科研而享受生活(我知道这样的例子),虽然会承受一些系里的压力,但教授的工作和工资还是不会丢掉的(工资会长得慢一些)。另一方面,因为没有退休年龄限制,如果想多做科研,可以一直工作到死而后已。因此,在美国名校当正教授主要是跟着兴趣或者雄心走,进退自如,还是有一定的吸引力的,比我们羡慕的陶渊明的隐居生活不差。因此千人计划吸引的美欧名校正教授不多,而主要吸引了其他学者。

    多年前大概还有不少人认为归国能做一些事,至少能改善小环境,因此有一些在美国的教授/副教授/助理教授接受了还不如美国研究生的工资回去当了长江学者。但2006年长江学者们被攻击,英名付诸流水,不用说改变国内科研环境,能自保和不挨骂就不错了。从此愿意回国工作的少了一些,当然还是有一些人在逆境中做出了成果。千人计划刚推出时,我以为这个局面会被改变,但现在看来也没有改变。也许很多人都感觉到了归国了即使有一时的鲜花掌声,想做成事太难了,挨网民的骂少不了,可能还需要为5斗米折腰或者成为现有体制的牺牲品。即使改善小环境都难,有时还被环境改变。在国内这种唯有院士高的体制下,即使是学术水平比院士高的千人也不会对国内学术界有影响力,还可能受院士的压制,更谈不上改变学术环境了。至于有些归国学者还希望在国内成为院士,就更只能适应国内体制而被国内环境改变了。雄心壮志也只能被雨打风吹去了。也就是说,归国后不仅改变不了世界, 可能连正常的糖水都卖不了,只能到处折腰,说违心的话,甚至只能卖假糖水。那是不是还值得干呢?从已经回国的一些学者来看,虽然他们“费尽了移山心力”,不但没有“伟烈丰功”(抄大观楼长联),常常是困难地适应体制,有时毁誉参半,甚至声败名裂。
           
    前些日子看见韩国网站上有一篇文章“海外留学决定了韩中日命运”,分析中日韩海外留学生对本国的贡献,觉得有点“旁观者清”的味道,尤其是其中讲中国120名留美学童回国后要接受《圣谕广训》的再教育(事实的准确性我没有核对),无力推动中国的变化, 这与当今是不是有些类似呢? (朝鲜的留学生更惨。)全文转载如下:

 


朝鲜日报中文网
海外留学决定了韩中日命运

20世纪初,韩国和中国分别沦落为殖民地和半殖民地国家,而日本则成为强大的帝国。决定三个国家不同命运的是对接受西方文化的态度和时间上的差距。具有决定性意义的转折点是甲午战争(18941895年),但成败早在1880年就已经确定。 
1860年英法联军攻入北京后,中国认识到武器和技术上的差距,发起了洋务运动,但直到10年后才向海外派遣留学生。1872年清朝
政府向美国派遣120 10多岁的“留美幼童”,留学时间为15年,但1881年突然将他们全部召回国,并从1889年到1896年再也没派遣留学生。中国留学生们每周日都要聚集在官府,背诵含有雍正帝的儒教教育思想的《圣谕广训》。因此,他们无力推动中国的变化,仍然无法改变天子家臣的身份。 
日本在德川幕府时期派遣了第一批海外留学生,明治维新(1868年)后,留学生人数进一步增加,1873年超过了1000人。他们打着“文明开化”的旗帜吸收西方的一切文化与知识,早早去留学的伊藤博文、井上馨等早在19世纪80年
就已经身居要职,与国民分享留学成果。  
1881年前往日本学习近代文化的朝士视察团的一员鱼允中深刻认识到派遣留学生的必要性。他说:“
在是以知识的力量一决雌雄的时候。如果废除科举,那些追寻建功扬名的人将争相恐后地去国外学习才艺和知识回国。”

1883年,朝鲜王室向日本派遣了100多名留学生,但在1884年甲申政变失败后,他们被控了朝鲜的袁世凯全部拉往刑场斩首。 
近130年后的今天,在美国留学的学生人数逆转为中国、韩国、日本。不知这一变化又将对东方三国的未来产生什么样的影响

How to Increase Your Papers Citation and H Index


This paper will reveal to you how to increase your papers citation and boost your h index in 5 simple steps. From Nelson Tansu, the youngest professor in Indonesia, he reveals his secret how to raise your citation volume rapidly. Tansu is the youngest professor in Indonesia with over 200 papers and 2000 citations at the age of 33 years old. He is the only qualified professor to give this advice and to show real evidence. These are secret tricks held so long by Tansu, it is a treasure so remember it well, now only reveal to you. The 5 secret steps to increase your citation index.(1) Self citation and More Self CitationSelf citation can increase more than double of your citation index.
Cite your own work in every single paper. Cite a lot of it. Many self citation increase your papers citation. More than 50% self citation and you can double your h index very fast.
A research paper found that many self citations can increase the number of citations by others!
http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2007/04/does_selfcitati.html
A lot of self citation is the first important key!
Here is an evidence of the total self citation gain you can achive: with self citation, total citation is 1428, h index 23. Without self citation you only can have h index of 13.You can double citation volume and h index!
Here are some more examples

 (2) Double publication
Write a paper for a conference with many self citations. Then slightly change the title of the paper and publish it in a journal. Remember self citation. You now got 2 publications, and also double citation.

Example: Tansu wrote this paper  for Winter Topicals (WTM), 2011 IEEE Conference, title: Selective area epitaxy of ultra-high density InGaN based quantum dots
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5730033
This paper has 8 self citations

Then he published the same paper (slightly change title) in Nanoscale Research Letters 2011, http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/342
Just need to slightly change the title to: "Selective area epitaxy of ultra-high density InGaN quantum dots by diblock copolymer lithography. And this paper has 19 Self Citations. The content of the paper remains the same.
So now you have 2 publications and also double your citations. 


(3) Rapid self citationWhen writing a new paper, quote as many of your own paper as possible in the first two sentences, even if they are not relevant. You can achieve 20 self citations just in the first 2 sentences. See an example in the prestigious famous Journal of Applied Physics, you can play the trick:
 
 
The first paragraph already have 30 references, you can have many self citations just in the first 2 sentences.Read the first sentence, and look at the reference! Is there a particular reason why in the first few words you need 19 references on light emitting diodes? And in the full sentence you need 26 references? I tell you now, the secret reason is of course can be found when you look at the reference list (figure below), because reference 1 until 24 has papers written by Tansu. I have highlighted all Tansu in the reference. Almost all have Tansu as author. Can you now see what is meant by self citation? Self citation is deliberately citing your own work even if it is not really relevant to the paper and with the intention to increase citation volume. This is how you increase citation index. The first sentence you cite as much as possible your own paper, even if it is not relevant.

(4) Goto SPIE Conference
  

Every year SPIE has many conferences around the states, attend one of them and submit 6 papers. SPIE don't have strict rules (unlike IEEE) on number of references. Do as many self citations as you can, even 40 self citation per paper.  You can have a large gain of 180 self citations just from 1 conference. 
In 2010, Tansu presented 6 papers at SPIE West, and let’s look at the number of self citation:
1. Novel approaches for high-efficiency InGaN quantum wells light-emitting diodes: Device physics and epitaxy engineering   Tansu, N., Zhao, H., Zhang, J., Liu, G., Li, X.-H., Ee, Y.-K., Song, R., Huang, G.S.      2011    Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 7954, art. no. 795418
This paper has 40 self references to Tansu
Wow.. can you belive that? 40 self citation in a paper. This must be a world record in self citation. Tansu reported the best threshold in self citation.
2. Zhang, J., Zhao, H., Tansu, N.  2011    Gain characteristics of deep UV AlGaN quantum wells lasers. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 7953, art. no. 79530H
This paper has 27 self references to Tansu
3. Enhancement of light extraction efficiency of InGaN quantum wells light-emitting diodes using TiO2 microsphere arrays     Li, X.-H., Ee, Y.-K., Song, R., Tansu, N.      2011    Proceedings of SPIE - The
International Society for Optical Engineering 7954, art. no. 79540U
This paper has 27 self references to Tansu

4. Thermoelectric properties of MOCVD-grown AlInN alloys with various compositions Zhang, J.,Tong, H., Liu, G., Herbsommer, J.A., Huang, G.S., Tansu, N. 2011 Proceedings of SPIE – The International Society for Optical Engineering 7939, art. no. 79390O This paper has 27 self references to Tansu
5. Cathodoluminescence characteristics of linearly shaped staggered InGaN quantum wells light-emitting diodes Zhao, H., Zhang, J., Liu, G., Toma, T., Poplawsky, J.D., Dierolf, V., Tansu, N.2011 Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 7939, art. no.793905 This paper has 27 self references to Tansu
6. Analysis of thermoelectric properties of AlInN semiconductor alloys Zhang, J., Tong, H.,Herbsommer, J.A., Tansu, N. 2011 Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for OpticalEngineering 7933, art. no. 79330X
This paper has 28 self references to Tansu
Tansu really nail it hard this year, he got 176 citations from a single SPIE conference. Can you imagine that? 176 self citation from just 6 papers
This is how to get the most citation in as little time as possible. Tansu definitely gain a large self citation. This citation gain characteristic is so strong that Tansu reported the best threshold in self citation, ever! World’s fastest self citation record. Towards 200 self citations per SPIE conference.

(5) Quote more references and cover up your act, the important is the number of self citationTo make it less obvious that you are doing self citation, quote many other references as well. For example if you have 15 self citation, quote 80 other references in a paper. It looks like a small percent of self citation, but you already got 15 self citation. This is a clever trick that only Tansu can teach you.
A paper in Nature also said an easy way to boost paper citation is to include many more references
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100813/full/news.2010.406.html But of course they forget about self citation is the most important
This paper was published in Energy Express, a supplement to Optics Express, Tansu can make an express self citation. This paper has 16 self citation!
But to cover up the dirty act, Tansu cited 92 references. This makes the self citation a small percentage, but in fact the actual number that counts. 16 self citations increase 16 citations. Who the hell wrote a research paper with 92 references? All other papers in Optics Express only has 10 to 20 references. Why the hell you need 92 references? This is clearly a dirty trick created by Tansu to cover up his self citation.
That’s all the 5 easy steps to increase your citation. I hope you can use it and double your h index.


如何提高你的论文引用和H指数本文将揭示你如何增加你的论文引文和提高您的H指数在5个简单的的步骤。从尼尔森箪,在印尼最年轻的教授,他透露他的秘密如何迅速提高您的引文量。箪是在印尼最年轻的200多篇论文和在2000年33岁的年龄引文的教授。他是唯一合格的教授给了这一建议,表现出真正的证据。这些都是由箪举行这么久的秘诀,它是个宝,所以记得很清楚,现在只能透露给你。秘密的5个步骤来增加您的引文索引。(1)自引和更多的自我引自引,可以增加更多的引文索引一倍以上。引用你自己的工作在每一个文件。引用了很多。许多自我引用,增加您的论文引用。 50%以上的自引,你可以双击你的h指数非常快。一个研究报告发现,许多自我引文可以增加被别人引用的次数!http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2007/04/does_selfcitati.html很多自我引用的第一个重要的关键!这里是一个总的自我引用的增益可以达到的证据:与自我引用,总引用是1428,H指数23。没有自我引用,你只能有h的13.You指数可以双引量和H指数!请参阅完整的引文数据库,http://whatisgenius.blogspot.com/2011/08/how-to-increase-tansu-h-index.html
 
下面是一些例子http://whatisgenius.blogspot.com/2011/05/self-consistent-citation-analysis.htmlhttp://whatisgenius.blogspot.com/2011/06/tansu-did-it-again-and-again.htmlhttp://whatisgenius.blogspot.com/2011/06/tansu-did-it-again-novel-self-citations.html



 
(2)双出版物写许多自我引文会议文件。然后稍微改变的文件的标题,并刊登在杂志上。记住我的自我引用。你现在有2出版物和双引。例:箪冬季Topicals写道本文(WTM),2011年IEEE会议,标题:选择区域外延的超高密度的量子点的InGaNhttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5730033本文有8个自我引文然后,他发表在纳米研究快报“2011年相同的纸张(稍微改变标题),http://www.nanoscalereslett.com/content/6/1/342只需要稍微改变标题:“选择性的超高密度InGaN量子点嵌段共聚物光刻技术领域的外延,本文自文献19的文件的内容保持不变。所以,现在你有2出版物和双重您的引文。
(3)快速自引用当编写一个新的文件,报价为尽可能多的前两句在自己的论文,即使他们是不相关的的。只是在第2句话可以实现20自参考文献。见负盛名的著名应用物理杂志“的一个例子,你可以玩的伎俩:
第一段已经有30引用,你可以有许多自我引文,只是在第2句话。读第一句,并参考看看!是否有一个特别的原因,为什么在第一几句话,你需要发光二极管19参考吗?完整的句子,你需要26引用吗?我现在告诉你,秘密的原因当然是可以发现,当你看在参考清单(如下图),因为参考1至24箪书面文件。我已经强调所有参考箪。几乎所有作者箪。你现在可以看到自引是什么意思?自引是故意引你自己的工作,即使它不是真正相关的文件和打算增加引量。这是你如何增加引文索引。你列举尽可能多的自己的论文,即使是不相关的的第一句。更多的例子在这里http://whatisgenius.blogspot.com/2011/05/self-citation-in-applied-physics.html(4)转到SPIE会议SPIE每年围绕国家的许多会议,参加其中之一,并提交6篇。 SPIE没有严格的规则(不像IEEE)的引用数。不要多达可以自行引用,甚至40%的纸张自我引用。你可以有一个刚刚从大会,1 180自我引文的大增益。在2010年,箪提出6论文在光学学报西,让我们来看看在自我引用:1。高效率的InGaN量子阱发光二极管器件物理和外延工程箪,北路,赵,H.,张,刘,G.,李,X.-H.,EE,Y:新方法.-光,宋,R.,黄,高盛2011年SPIE论文集 - 7954光学工程,艺术的国际协会。没有。 795418本文有40箪自我引用哇..你可以相信的,? 40在一篇论文中自我引用。这必须在自引用的世界纪录。箪报告中自我引用的最佳阈值。2。张,赵,H.,箪,北路2011深紫外光氮化铝镓量子阱激光器的增益特性。 SPIE论文集 - 7953光学工程,艺术的国际协会。没有。 79530H本文有27箪自我引用3。加强InGaN量子阱发光二极管使用二氧化钛微阵列李X.-H.,EE,Y.-K.,宋河,箪,N 2011 SPIE论文集光提取效率 -国际光学工程学会7954艺术。没有。 79540U本文有27箪自我引用4。张,J.,塘,H.,刘,G.,Herbsommer,司法机构政务长,黄,高盛,箪,N 2011 SPIE论文集各种成分的MOCVD生长AlInN合金热电性能 - 国际光学工程学会7939 ,艺术。没有。 79390O本文箪27日至自我引用5。直线形的阴极发光特性交错的InGaN量子阱发光二极管赵,H.,张,刘,G.,托马,T.,Poplawsky,法学博士,Dierolf,五,箪,N.2011 SPIE论文集 - 7939光学工程国际社会,艺术。 no.793905本文27日至箪自我6。热电性能研究AlInN半导体合金张,塘,H.,Herbsommer,JA,箪,N 2011 SPIE论文集 - OpticalEngineering 7933,艺术国际交流协会的分析。没有。 79330X本文有28箪自我引用箪真的指甲很难今年,他从一个单一的SPIE会议176参考文献。你能想象吗? 176只有6篇论文的自引这是如何在尽可能少的时间获取最引。箪肯定获得一个大的自我引用。这引用增益特性,是如此强烈,箪报告中自我引用的最好的门槛,不断!世界上最快的自我引用记录。建立SPIE会议的200%的自我引文。
(5)报价更多的参考资料,并掩盖了你的行为,重要的是自我引用为了让不太明显,你正在做自我引用,引用以及许多其他参考资料。例如,如果您有15自我引用,报价80在一份文件中的其他引用。它看起来像一个小百分比的自引,但你已经得到了15自我引用。这是一个聪明的把戏,只箪可以教你。在自然界中的文件还表示,一个简单的方法来提高纸张引用的是包括多引用http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100813/full/news.2010.406.html,但是,当然,他们忘记了自我引用是最重要的
 
本文是在光学快报的补充能源快车,出版,箪可以表达自我引用。本文有16个自引用!但为了掩盖肮脏的行为,箪引92引用。这使得自引所占的比例很小,但其实实际数量,计数。 16自我引文增加16引文。谁是地狱写了92引用的研究论文?光学快报所有其他文件,只有10至20引用。究竟为什么你需要92引用?这显然​​是箪创建一个肮脏的伎俩,来掩盖他的自我引用。这是所有的5个简单的步骤来增加您的引文。我希望你可以用它和您的H指数的两倍。

如何发表高水平文章


http://bbs.sciencenet.cn/thread-384383-1-1.html

要做高水平的论文,个人认为 主要有两点:

1。选题。一定要新,前沿。把握的方法是每期必读Science和Nature
等影响因子超过10的杂志。 从中看出本领域的前沿方向, 也可以知道
做什么容易发高水平论文。 很多跟踪Science的研究就发到PNAS去了,
发PNAS也很酷啊。 一定不要去读太多影响因子小余5的杂志的文章,
除非你愿意做苦力,影响因子5左右的论文, 虽然有水平, 但很难上
台阶。 总之就是, 选题要起点高。

2。会写文章。 很多文章其实没什么东西, 就是会写而已。 关于这方面,
读多了文献和写了一些文章后自己就有心得了。 题目越简单的文章越酷。
希望大家毕业的时候能来一篇What is ...或者 is it ...? 的文章。

关键要让自己起点高,时常追踪最新进展, 找到最新研究的不足,
如果你能开辟新领域, 那就更好了。



各国际会议的影响因子



from: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_48a6fe080100c26f.html


转自:http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/impact.html

这个是citeseer排的影响因子,包括conferences & journals

Estimated impact of publication venues in Computer Science (higher is better) - May 2003 (CiteSeer)
Generated from documents in the CiteSeer database. This analysis does not include citations where one or more authors of the citing and cited articles match. This list is automatically generated and may contain errors. Only venues with at least 25 articles are shown.

Impact is estimated using the average citation rate, where citations are normalized using the average citation rate for all articles in a given year, and transformed using ln (n+1) where n is the number of citations.

Publication details obtained from DBLP by Michael Ley. Only venues contained in DBLP are included.

视觉和图形学相关的被Highlight了。

1. OSDI: 3.31 (top 0.08%)
2. USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems: 3.23 (top 0.16%)
3. PLDI: 2.89 (top 0.24%)
4. SIGCOMM: 2.79 (top 0.32%)
5. MOBICOM: 2.76 (top 0.40%)
6. ASPLOS: 2.70 (top 0.49%)
7. USENIX Annual Technical Conference: 2.64 (top 0.57%)
8. TOCS: 2.56 (top 0.65%)
9. SIGGRAPH: 2.53 (top 0.73%)
10. JAIR: 2.45 (top 0.81%)
15. Machine Learning: 2.20 (top 1.22%)
44. AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1: 1.87 (top 3.60%)
46. Artificial Intelligence: 1.85 (top 3.76%)
50. IJCAI (1): 1.82 (top 4.09%)
58. ICCV: 1.78 (top 4.75%)
88. ECCV: 1.58 (top 7.20%)
89. ACM Transactions on Graphics: 1.57 (top 7.28%)
103. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence: 1.54 (top 8.43%)
105. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics: 1.53 (top 8.59%)
112. AAAI: 1.49 (top 9.17%)
121. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia: 1.45 (top 9.90%)
135. Cognitive Science: 1.38 (top 11.05%)
144. IEEE Visualization: 1.35 (top 11.79%)
147. International Journal of Computer Vision: 1.33 (top 12.03%)
153. ECCV (1): 1.29 (top 12.53%)
157. ML: 1.28 (top 12.85%)
174. IJCAI (2): 1.24 (top 14.25%)
183. ACM Multimedia: 1.22 (top 14.98%)
191. AAAI/IAAI: 1.20 (top 15.64%)
195. ACM Computing Surveys: 1.19 (top 15.97%)
220. ECCV (2): 1.13 (top 18.01%)
231. IJCAI: 1.10 (top 18.91%)
233. SIGIR: 1.10 (top 19.08%)
247. ACM Multimedia (1): 1.07 (top 20.22%)
249. Computer Graphics Forum: 1.07 (top 20.39%)
269. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing: 1.04 (top 22.03%)
300. IEEE MultiMedia: 0.97 (top 24.57%)
325. AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 2: 0.93 (top 26.61%)
339. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory: 0.91 (top 27.76%)
450. AI Magazine: 0.72 (top 36.85%)
470. ECAI: 0.69 (top 38.49%)
526. ICVS: 0.62 (top 43.07%)
605. ICIP (2): 0.51 (top 49.54%)
679. ACCV: 0.42 (top 55.61%)
704. EMMCVPR: 0.38 (top 57.65%)
781. MICCAI: 0.31 (top 63.96%)
795. ECCV (3): 0.30 (top 65.11%)
845. Pattern Recognition Letters: 0.25 (top 69.20%)
858. ACM Multimedia (2): 0.24 (top 70.27%)
876. ACCV (1): 0.23 (top 71.74%)
903. ICIAP (2): 0.21 (top 73.95%)
904. CAIP: 0.21 (top 74.03%)
1006. DGCI: 0.14 (top 82.39%)
1031. ICAPR: 0.11 (top 84.43%)
1110. Electronic Imaging: 0.06 (top 90.90%)




from: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4d403dbe0100bpwp.html

SCI EI 收录

SCI Impact Factor Search:
SCI indexed journal list:
 
common journal with SCI indexed:
PATTERN RECOGN0031-320374982.019
IEEE T PATTERN ANAL0162-8828164923.579
PATTERN RECOGN LETT0167-865527480.853
PATTERN ANAL APPL1433-75412460.515
INT J PATTERN RECOGN0218-00145330.374
 
Inter. Conf. Science Indexed(SCI)------------------------------------------By R.R.Ji
顶级
1.     IJCAI: International Joint Conference on AI (each other year)
2.     AAAI: American Association for AI National Conference (Because the IJCAI conference is being held in North America in 2009, no AAAI conference will be held that year.)3.     COLT: Conference on Learning Theory
4.     ICNN/IJCNN: Intl (Joint) Conference on Neural Networks
5.     CVPR: IEEE Conf on Comp Vision and Pattern Recognition 
6.     ICCV: International Conference on Computer Vision
7.     ECCV: European Conference on Computer Vision
8.     DCC: Data Compression Conference
9.     ACM-SIGGRAPH
10.    ACM-MM: ACM Multimedia Conference
11.    ACM SIGCOM: ACM Conf on Communication Architectures, Protocols & Apps
12.    ACM SIGMETRICS
13.    ACM SIGMOD: ACM SIGMOD Conf on Management of Data
14.    ACM SIGIR: ACM Conference on Information Retrieval
15.    IEEE INFOCOM: conference on computer communications
16.    IEEE ICC: International conference on communications
17.    GLOBECOM:IEEE Global communication conference
18.    ACM RECOMB: Int. Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology
19.    ACM SIGKDD: Knowledge Discovery in Database
20.    ICML: International Conference on Machine Learning
21.    ISMB: International Society for Computational Biology - Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology
22.    ECCB: European Bioinformatics Institute - the European Conference on Computational Biology
一级  模式识别,计算机视觉、图像处理,多媒体技术,人机交互23.    IEEE ICIP: International conference on Image Processing (4 pages)
24.    IEEE ICASSP: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing

25.    IEEE ICMI: International Conference on Multimodal Interface
26.    IEEE ICME: International Conference on Multimedia and Expo
27.    FGR: Face & Gesture Recognition
28.    ICPR: International Conference on Pattern Recognition
29.   PCM: Pacific-Rim Conference on Multimedia
30.    ACCV: Asian Conference on Computer Vision

31.    IWDW: digital watermarking
多媒体计算方向
32.  IEEE ICIP: International conference on Image Processing
33.  VCIP: Visual Communication and Image Processing
34.  IEEE ICME: International Conference on Multimedia and Expo
35.  PCM: Pacific-Rim Conference on Multimedia
36.  IEEE ICASSP: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
37.  ICPR: International Conference on Pattern Recognition
38.  ICIG: International Conference on Image and Graphics
机器学习
39.  IEEE ICDM: International Conference on Data Mining
40.  NIPS: Neural Information Processing Systems
41.  IEEE WI - International Conference on Web Intelligence
42.  CIKM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
43.  IEEE ICDL: International Conference on Digital Library
 
相关国内一级/核心期刊
[1]        计算机学报(中、英文版)
[2]        计算机科学与技术学报(英文版) Journal of Computer Science and Technology(JCST)
[3]        软件学报
[4]        电子学报
[5]        自动化学报
[6]        通讯学报
[7]        中国图象图形学报
[8]        计算机辅助设计与图形学学报
[9]        计算机研究与发展

Friday, April 5, 2013

任俠文化

「千古艱難唯一俠」的任俠文化,
道之所在,雖千萬人吾往矣;
義之所當,千金散盡不後悔;
情之所鍾,世俗禮法如糞土;
興之所在,與君痛飲三百杯

Thursday, April 4, 2013

NIST SRE 1997-2012 Quick Overview


The whole table is extracted from [1] except noted otherwise.

Year
Common Condition(s)
Evaluation Features
1997
Two handset training(involving two-session [2])
Different number test,
30 second durations.
Tests of 3 durations, 3 training conditions,
Switchboard-2 Phase 1 data
1998
One handset training (involving two-session [2])
Same number tests,
30 second durations.
Tests of 3 duration, 3 training conditions,
Switchboard-2 Phase 2 data,
Handset type detector info made available.
1999
One handset training,
Different number electret tests,
15-45 seconds duration tests.
Added multi-speaker tasks,
Variable durations used in main test trials,
Switchbaord-2 Phase 3 data.
2000
One session training,
Different number electret tests,
15-45 seconds duration tests.
Re-segmented 1997& 1998 test data for reuse,
Extra test on AHUMADA Spanish data.
2001
One session training,
Different number electret tests,
15-45 seconds duration tests.
Repeated 2000 main test with added trials,
Additional test on Switchboard cellular data,
Additional test allowing human or machine transcripts with extended training data.
2002
One-session training on conv. phone data
Cellular data, alternative tests of extended training, speaker segmentation, and a limited corpus of simulated forensic data
2003
One-session training on conv. phone data
Cellular data, extended training
2004
Handheld landline conv. phone speech, English only
Multi-language data with bilingual speakers
2005
English only with handheld tel. set
Included cross-channel trials with mic. test, both sides of 2-channel convs. provided
2006
English only trials (including mic. test trials)
Included cross-channel trials with  mic. test
2008
8 – contrasting English and bilingual speakers, interview and conv. phone speech along with cross-condition trials
Interview speech recorded over multiple mic channels and conv. phone speech recorded over mic and tel channels, multiple languages
2010
9 – contrasting tel and mic channels, interview and conversational phone speech, and high, low and normal vocal effort
Multiple microphones, phone calls with high, low, and normal vocal effort, aging data (Greybeard), HASR
2012
5 – interview test without noise, conv. phone test without noise, interview test with added noise, conv. phone test with added noise, conv. phone test collected in noisy environment
Target speakers specified in advance (from previous evals) with large amounts of training, some test calls collected in noisy environments, phone test data with added noise

Reference:

[1]  www.odyssey2012.org/html/doc/martin_oddyssey12_pres.pptx
[2] Doddington, G.R., Pryzbocki, M, Martin, A.F., and Reynolds, D.A. NIST Speaker Recognition Evaluation: Overview, Methodology, Systems, Results, Perspective (Invited Paper), Speech Communication, September 2000.