- Use of uninitialised memory
- Reading/writing memory after it has been free'd
- Reading/writing off the end of malloc'd blocks
- Reading/writing inappropriate areas on the stack
- Memory leaks -- where pointers to malloc'd blocks are lost forever
- Mismatched use of malloc/new/new [] vs free/delete/delete []
- Overlapping src and dst pointers in memcpy() and related functions
- Some misuses of the POSIX pthreads API
gcc -o test -g test.cThis creates an executable named test. To check for memory leaks during the execution of test, try
valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes --num-callers=20 --track-fds=yes ./testThis outputs a report to the terminal like
==9704== Memcheck, a memory error detector for x86-linux. ==9704== Copyright (C) 2002-2004, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==9704== Using valgrind-2.2.0, a program supervision framework for x86-linux. ==9704== Copyright (C) 2000-2004, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==9704== For more details, rerun with: -v ==9704== ==9704== ==9704== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 11 from 1) ==9704== malloc/free: in use at exit: 35 bytes in 2 blocks. ==9704== malloc/free: 3 allocs, 1 frees, 47 bytes allocated. ==9704== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v ==9704== searching for pointers to 2 not-freed blocks. ==9704== checked 1420940 bytes. ==9704== ==9704== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 2 ==9704== at 0x1B903D38: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:131) ==9704== by 0x80483BF: main (test.c:15) ==9704== ==9704== ==9704== 19 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 2 ==9704== at 0x1B903D38: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:131) ==9704== by 0x8048391: main (test.c:8) ==9704== ==9704== LEAK SUMMARY: ==9704== definitely lost: 35 bytes in 2 blocks. ==9704== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==9704== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==9704== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.Let's look at the code to see what happened. Allocation #1 (19 byte leak) is lost because p is pointed elsewhere before the memory from Allocation #1 is free'd. To help us track it down, Valgrind gives us a stack trace showing where the bytes were allocated. In the 19 byte leak entry, the bytes were allocate in test.c, line 8. Allocation #2 (12 byte leak) doesn't show up in the list because it is free'd. Allocation #3 shows up in the list even though there is still a reference to it (p) at program termination. This is still a memory leak! Again, Valgrind tells us where to look for the allocation (test.c line 15).
Valgrind can detect many kinds of errors. Here's an explanation of the various error messages.
'via Blog this'
No comments:
Post a Comment